With
exclusive access throughout the design process of what would have
been Yorkshire's tallest building we
look at the evolution of a building that gets progressively more
ambitious before reaching a frustrating anti-climax.
History.
Sheffield is a famous city, famous for it's steel, male strippers
doing the Full Monty and an 80s band called Def Leppard. Despite
being one of the leading cities in the U.K (and having the fifth
largest population) it has seriously lagged behind other regional
centers since the 1980s hurt it with a massive downturn in employment
there. Only lately have things been changing.
The
Development.
Recently Sheffield has seen the embryonic start of a property market
similar to Manchester in the early 90s and companies are realising
that thanks to low rents, superb transport system and cheap land
prices there is money to be made there once more. The center of
this is termed 'high-rise alley' that lies just off West Street.
With plans for a nearby 19 storey tower (now increased to 21) designed
by Broadway Malayan on St Mary's Gate, and a 17 floor tower on the
abandonded Mercedes garage across the road.
It was on this pivotal spot of Chesham House that the developers
Manor Property Group decided to build a landmark as the center point
of what will be the new retail quarter of Sheffield, a massive development
of the surrounding area with the aim to rival Manchester as a successful
example of inner-city living.
Project Details.
Chesham House
was originally concieved as a 14 floor medium-rise back in 2002
and designed by Bond Bryan Architects. The developer however wasn't
pleased with the small number of apartments, which totalled only
150, and looked to nearby West One and the seemingly insaitiable
demand for such units in Sheffield, thinking that the sky was literally
the limt.
It was this logic that saw Bond Bryan work on gradually increasing
the the size the only way it could be, given the limted plot, by
it getting taller.
By December 2002 design number 2 had been reached incorporating
many more apartments and a wedge-like design similar to Ian Simpson's
work in Manchester.
By February the project size had gone up again, with the height
hitting 110m and 25 floors including plant ones, which is massive
by Sheffield standards as can be seen from the massing images which
feature this design.
The same design traits as design number 2 were still present, the
cladding shows some of the advantages a wedge-shaped residential
tower can provide such as more roof terraces and flats that are
properly open to the outside.
With the increasing size of the wedge a number of design problems
became apparent, the more pressing of which was fire regulations.
The larger and taller the wedge got the further away some apartments
were from fire escapes and so specially fire-proofed corridors had
to be added which knocked the cost up.
Building a tall building adds cost for every meter of height you
reach anyway so this with the necessary extra safety additions made
the third design uneconomical with the budget coming in at just
over £30 million.
The major problem was not so much these costs as the income compared
to them which is less in Sheffield than cities such as Leeds per
unit thanks to Sheffield's relatively low house prices and so the
planning application that should have been filed in late February
for this design never went ahead.
Faced with finding a new way to make the project cost effective
a twin tower solution was reached, the taller tower which was residential
would have none of the extra costs incurred thanks to fire regulations
whilst the shorter building would provide office space for a client
creating a mixed use scheme and alternative income for the developer
that was still a landmark scheme.
The design this time was radically different to the wedges with
an attempt to do something different. Anyone who has walked down
West Street will see the samey architecture on new developments
and this was an attempt to inject some variety and move away from
the brick and glass that is commonly used.
Sadly the problem came up again that the project was simply too
expensive and wouldn't provide the necessary return and the developer
wanted it scaled down to 17 floors. It was at this point that it
was put on hold where it remains today having come within a week
of going ahead.
Interview.
SN.com spoke with the project designer Matt Bowker of Bond Bryan
a little more about the site and the evolution of the towers through
the planning process.
What was the original aim for the site and development?
The
original brief called for a mixed use scheme providing 150 apartments
and commercial premises, possibly a casino. Car parking was to be
1:1 ratio for residential with additional parking provided for the
commercial aspect.
At what point in the project was it decided to switch the design
to
something taller?
It was decided that it was a key location and that we should
aim to design a landmark building on the site. However when we realized
how much parking we needed to provide and that the first residential
floors were going to be 8-10 stories above ground it was always
going to be a tall building.
What were you aiming at with the first tall design?
The aim was to design a landmark tower that fulfilled all the
criteria of the brief. The wedge shape was decided upon for several
reasons and was a good solution for the particular site. The design
afforded great views over the surrounding city and countryside,
gradually rose higher in a series of steps along Charter Row towards
the taller towers in the CBD (namely the 15 storey BT house and
Grosvener Hotel) and provided a dramatic statement on the Sheffield
skyline. Slowly but surely the number of apartments increased to
almost 200 as did the height which reached a maximum of approx 110m.
What advantages did the tallest have over the shorter ones?
Apart from its landmark status, great views and contribution
to the city skyline...very few. It was more inefficient as a building
and less cost effective than either of the two alternative designs
you have.
Why did you dump the wedge for a twin tower solution?
We tried to obtain greater value from the site by having a tall
residential tower with 150 apartments and a shorter office tower
with approx 36000 sq. ft. on a shared podium. This was a much more
efficient and cost effective solution to build, would have yielded
a greater return than the wedge as well as retaining the height,
views and landmark status of the previous scheme.
Where
did the inspiration for the designs come from?
A
desire to get away from the brick, render and timber panelling that
is so
comonplace throughout Sheffield and indeed the country for residential
projects like this. We wanted to create a building that had an upmarket
feel to it and stood out from the rest. We used exposed structural
steel elements and a skyline feature to celebrate Sheffields long
association with the steel industry in conjuntion with floor to
ceiling glazing and terracotta rainscreen panels. The palette of
materials was consistent throughout all the schemes we considered.
What are the
plans for the future with the site and designs?
It's hard
to say at the present time, possibly it could be incorporated into
an overall masterplan that Broadway Malyan are preparing for the
proposed retail quarter. The designs will be put on ice until such
time that they might be required so its not completely dead but
any development is a long way off.
Future
Prospects.
Despite the positive aspects of the project the sum's didnt add
up but that doesn't mean they won't in the future. In Leeds such
a development would have turned more than half a million pounds
profit on a thirty million investment as the developers could charge
more for each residential unit however this doesn't mean that the
project is dead. As property prices in the area continue to outstrip
the national average the project becomes more profitable and ultimately
likely to go ahead.
Planning documents seen by SN.com confirm that the council is supportive
of such developments and is actively seeking a greater amount of
apartments in the center of the city with developments such as this,
and has no objections to the height of the buildings either as long
as they are well planned.
Whether we see a twin tower on the Chesham House site like the final
design remains to be seen but it seems likely something will eventually
go there - afterall they are hardly going to leave a blank block
in a masterplan.
|